By Law.com on 01/10/2019
\”… A support magistrate in Manhattan’s Family Court acted outside the scope of her statutory authority by resolving “issues of contested paternity involving claims of equitable estoppel” and, as a result, the magistrate’s judgment that a man is the father of a child must be reversed, a state appeals court has ruled. ….\”
Read the entire article: https://www.law.com/
Proposal targets paternity fraud
